> as I would define it
And I would define it as *more* free than licenses thatg allow people to charge money for access to the document.
This sort of insistence on One Special License is exactly what is limiting the adoption of open access.
Nice chronology of open access. Unfortunately CC-BY-NC-SA, so itself not full open access as I would define it (though better than pay-walled, obviously).
On 22 Jun 2015, at 10:32, marie lebert <email@example.com> wrote:
Best regards from France,
GOAL mailing list