> as I would define it

 

And I would define it as *more* free than licenses thatg allow people to charge money for access to the document.

 

This sort of insistence on One Special License is exactly what is limiting the adoption of open access.

 

-- Stephen

 

From: boai-forum-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:boai-forum-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Jan Velterop
Sent: June-22-15 7:48 AM
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Cc: boai-forum@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: [BOAI] Re: [GOAL] a chronology about open access

 

Nice chronology of open access. Unfortunately CC-BY-NC-SA, so itself not full open access as I would define it (though better than pay-walled, obviously). 

Jan Velterop


On 22 Jun 2015, at 10:32, marie lebert <marie.lebert@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear all:

 

 

Best regards from France,

 

Marie

 

_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal