Budapest Open Access Initiative: BOAI Forum Archive[BOAI] [Forum Home] [index] [prev] [next] [options] [help]
[BOAI] Re: Elsevier Still Onside of Angels on Immediate, Unembargoed Green OA Self-Archiving By Its Authors
From: Stevan Harnad <harnad AT ecs.soton.ac.uk>
On 2013-05-02, at 4:28 AM, Fotis Georgatos <fotis AT mail.cern.ch> wrote: > On May 2, 2013, at 9:17 AM, Andras Holl wrote: >> Regardless however right you are, Elsevier's play with words ↵ succesfully confuses >> a large number of authors, who do not deposit because of this. > > It is the role of research institutes and university boards to step > forward and make an emphatic statement about the status quo and, > how their subordinates/affiliates are expected to behave. Taxpayers > do not have an excuse of confusion when they make their contributions > so, that puts some responsibility on the individual authors, too. > > btw. -sorry if the question has been asked again over here- > is there an open ranking list of universities worldwide > as regards the clarity of their messaging in relation to Open Access? Dear Fotis, We have done a study testing the correlation (positive and significant) between the strength of the institutional Green OA mandates in ROARMAP and the number of deposits in the repository. An earlier preprint is below. An updated version will be posted shortly. Details available from Dr. Yassine Gargouri: <yassinegargouri AT hotmail.com> The Liege mandate, the strongest, has a deposit rate of over 80%. The Liege model -- immediate-deposit (ID/OA) designated the mechanism for submitting publications for performance review -- is now being adopted more and more, with UK's HEFCE/REF proposing it also for funder mandates. Best wishes, Stevan Testing the Finch Hypothesis on Green OA Mandate Ineffectiveness Yassine Gargouri, Vincent Lariviere, Yves Gingras, Tim Brody, Les Carr, Stevan ↵ Harnad (Submitted on 30 Oct 2012 (v1), last revised 2 Nov 2012 (this version, v2)) We have now tested the Finch Committee's Hypothesis that Green Open Access ↵ Mandates are ineffective in generating deposits in institutional repositories. With data ↵ from ROARMAP on institutional Green OA mandates and data from ROAR on institutional ↵ repositories, we show that deposit number and rate is significantly correlated with mandate ↵ strength (classified as 1-12): The stronger the mandate, the more the deposits. The ↵ strongest mandates generate deposit rates of 70%+ within 2 years of adoption, compared to the ↵ un-mandated deposit rate of 20%. The effect is already detectable at the national level, ↵ where the UK, which has the largest proportion of Green OA mandates, has a national OA rate ↵ of 35%, compared to the global baseline of 25%. The conclusion is that, contrary to the ↵ Finch Hypothesis, Green Open Access Mandates do have a major effect, and the stronger ↵ the mandate, the stronger the effect (the Liege ID/OA mandate, linked to ↵ research performance evaluation, being the strongest mandate model). RCUK (as well as all universities, research institutions and research funders worldwide) would ↵ be well advised to adopt the strongest Green OA mandates and to integrate ↵ institutional and funder mandates.
[BOAI] [Forum Home] [index] [prev] [next] [options] [help]
E-mail: email@example.com .