Budapest Open Access Initiative: BOAI Forum Archive[BOAI] [Forum Home] [index] [prev] [next] [options] [help]
[BOAI] Re: Cliff Lynch on Institutional Archives
From: Thomas Krichel <krichel AT openlib.org>
Stevan Harnad writes > Thomas gived exactly the correct answer to Chris! I didn't know this was a quiz :-) > What is needed is institutional self-archiving, distributed across its > departments interoperably, but customized to the different needs of the > different disciplines. That is a tall order. > (1) Institutions can mandate self-archiving, disciplines cannot. Cliff imagines that they can, but in practice, it will be tough. You can not put a KGB officer in every academic's office! > (2) Most disciplines do not have disciplinary OAI Archives at all. Sure, but all have some ways to communicate informally, and many have innovative channels. Sure, many of them stay small, but there is not technical obstacle to a meaningful aggergation. > (4) There are many other potential uses for institutional research > archives (apart from open access). I agree. If I would run an institution's archive I would back up all the web sites each year. In 20 years time, you would get a fascinating picture of the development of the institution. > (5) OAI-interoperability guarantees that institutional and disciplinary > self-archiving are equivalent from the open-access point of view, but > aggregating institutional packages out of distributed disciplinary > OAI archives is harder (though it is not clear how much harder) than > aggregating disciplinary packages out of distributed institutional > OAI archives. no, it is easier to construct feature-rich datasets out of disciplinary archives, because some of them will be prepared with the specifics of an aggregator in mind. With greetings from Minsk, Belarus, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
[BOAI] [Forum Home] [index] [prev] [next] [options] [help]
E-mail: email@example.com .