|
|||||||||
|
Budapest Open Access Initiative: BOAI Forum Archive [BOAI] [Forum Home] [index] [prev] [next] [options] [help]boaiforum messages[BOAI] Re: Wrong Advice On Open Access: History Repeating ItselfFrom: "Prof. Tom Wilson" <t.d.wilson AT sheffield.ac.uk>
Quoting Françoise Salager-Meyer <francoise.sm AT gmail.com>:
> >I agree that the only solution is aN INSTITUTIONAL MANDATE. My ↵
question is:
>
> In view of the fact that all researchers want to
> publish in top-notch jornals (the 5.000 core
> journals), isnt' there an incompatibility between
> the pre-print publishing of peer-reviewed papers
> and the subsequent publishing of the papers in
> one such journal? Will the publisher agree that
> the pre-print be published?
What is 'core' changes over time - the more you support free OA journsls, the
more likely it is that they will enter the core.
> I have a problem, for example, with the
> commercial publisher Peter Lang. It does NOT
> allow me to put in my institutional repository
> the papers (post-print) that have been published
> in Peter Lang books.
Don't publish with publishers that won't allow post-print archiving - go with
those that will. Or, better, publish in true OA journals.
> Elsevier acccepts the post-print publication
> under the conditon that one does not use the
> Elsevier logo.
>
> Can anymore please answer the pre-print question:
> will a commercial publisher accept that one put
> on one's institution IR the pre-prints of the
> papers to be later published in their journals?
That is a decision for the individual publisher - there is no general answer.
Some will, some won't.
--
To unsubscribe from the BOAI Forum, use the form on this page:
http://www.soros.org/openaccess/forum.shtml?f
[BOAI] [Forum Home] [index] [prev] [next] [options] [help]
|